Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for eight months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants: (a) using the fact that G, a place of recognition by contributing to a large number of programs, such as “F” of channel A, is known to the employees of Hyundai Motor Co., Ltd.; (b) accessed those who wish to be employed by the said company; and (c) provided that the said G may be employed by the said company through the said company.

A) After gathering to obtain money in the name of job training expenses, Defendant B played the role of raising the job training expenses by checking the person who wants to be employed by the above company, and Defendant A, upon receiving the job training expenses, intended to play a role of creating appearance that seems to request the above G to be employed formally.

Defendant

B Accessing the victim H, who was seeking the above company employment of the child at around October 2014, around which he had been seeking the above company employment of the child, and, at the same time, it was false to the effect that “G with the recognition of being contributed to the compilation channel is well-known to the high-ranking employees of the modern automobile visa room. However, upon request from G, the Defendant A requested G to obtain the employment of the said company at around that time.” The Defendant A requested G to obtain the victim’s child at the time.

However, G was aware of the employees of the above company, and there was no clear plan or ability to have the victim employed his child, and there was no definite answer that the Defendants could have employed the victim's child. Furthermore, even if the Defendants received money from the injured party as a means of employment training, the Defendants planned to use it for private purposes, such as entertainment expenses, and there was no intention or ability to have the victim employed the said company.

As such, the Defendants conspired to induce the victim, and then, they acquired the victim by making the victim transfer KRW 80 million from the victim to the agricultural bank account under the I’s name on November 13, 2014 to the employment teaching expense.

Summary of Evidence

1...