A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant forged documents to set up a right to lease on a deposit basis in C Apartment 2, 607, which is owned by the mother-friendly B, with the intention of borrowing money from the victim D.

1. Forging a private document or uttering of a falsified investigation document;

A. On October 23, 2013, the Defendant: (a) stated B’s name, resident registration number, and address in the delegation letter column of the certificate of seal imprint as if he/she was delegated by B without authority to exercise it at the center of volcano-dong, the center of volcano-dong; (b) forged B’s letter of delegation for certification of seal imprint, which is a private document on rights and obligations, and submitted it as if he/she was aware of the fact that the certificate of seal imprint was duly formed to the employee of the volcano-dong community service center.

B. On October 24, 2013, the Defendant: (a) borrowed KRW 35 million from the injured party’s office located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si; (b) stated B’s name in the column of the lessee of the apartment lease contract without authority to secure it; (c) affixed the seal impression of B in the name of B; (d) forged the apartment lease contract in the name of B, a private document on rights and obligations; and (e) submitted the forged apartment lease contract to the injured party as if he/she was genuine.

(c)

On October 24, 2013, the Defendant: (a) stated B’s name in the contract for the establishment of chonsegwon and in the column of the person who has established the right to lease on a deposit basis without authority, and affixed B’s seal imprint; (b) forged B’s contract for the establishment of chonsegwon and the letter of delegation on the right and obligation; and (c) submitted the forged contract for the establishment of chonsegwon and the letter of delegation to employees of the said attorney’s office, who may not be aware of the fact, as if they were genuine.

2. The Defendant’s fraud is around October 24, 2013.