beta
Text
The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.
Reasons
Parts of innocence
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is the operator of the Council (D; hereinafter referred to as the “Council”) and the seller of E (hereinafter referred to as the “the above apartment complex”), the seller of E (hereinafter referred to as the “Council”) and the victim F was the representative of the Council for Moving-In-Houses (hereinafter referred to as the “Council”) and the other victims (excluding the G), who worked for the enforcement department of the Council.
At around 16:34 on January 15, 2010, the Defendant posted a notice on the bulletin board at the Kafbook, stating that, “The apartment movement is the same as there is a separate part that it is vocationally different according to the writing. Of which, the representative of the occupants, members, and the female president of the same representative, etc., have been prudented at the time of the occupancy of the apartment. Among them, among them, if the result was that the “bank selection” where the most easy rebates can be obtained, the Defendant would have been able to be a result of raising a certain interest rate so that they may not have any money and have been able to receive any benefit from all a specific person, and the present executive book at this point was divided into a small number of won in which all the profits can be received by the specific person, and that only KRW 1 million was crupted with the remaining rice paper.”
However, the above facts did not confirm whether the execution department of the council was related to the right of interest and not, but did not have confirmed that the execution department of the council was merely a part of the defendant's prosecution, and there was no fact that the execution department of the council was promised or compensated for any consideration from the opposite side.
In addition, from January 3, 2010 to November 5, 2011, the Defendant posted a letter, such as the list of crimes, on the bulletin board of the said camera, thereby impairing the honor of victims (excluding the G) by revealing publicly false facts on the information and communications network, for the purpose of slandering them.
2. Determination
A. Relevant legal principles (1) Gu.