logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 04. 28. 선고 2016두33209 판결
(심리불속행)포스시스템 자료는 구체적이고 객관적인 자료라고 볼 수 있음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Busan High Court (Capwon)-2014-Nu-11949 ( October 20, 2016)

Title

(Recidion of Hearing)S system data can be seen as specific and objective data.

Summary

(b) The disposition that made the details of sales into taxation data is legitimate on the grounds that the taxation authority's responsibility for certification is highly likely to be misused as a means of tax evasion, and that there was no disclosure that some parts of the sales have been falsified.

Related statutes

Article 16 of the Framework Act on National Taxes

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2016Du33209

Plaintiff-Appellant

○ ○

Defendant-Appellee

○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Busan High Court (Chowon) Decision 2014Nu11949 Decided January 20, 2016

Imposition of Judgment

December 10, 2015

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

While examining the grounds of appeal in comparison with the records of this case and the judgment of the court below, the ground of appeal on the grounds of appeal is not deemed to have been rejected or not.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow