logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.05.02 2018나73799
소유권이전등기절차 이행의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. On October 4, 1984, the land of this case was divided into C forest land in M forest land of the Gyeonggi-do Gyeongjin-gun on the same day and was subject to registration conversion B as of the same day, and the name of the administrative district was changed as stated in the purport of the claim on October 22, 199.

(2) Under the Joseon Land Survey Order enforced during the Japanese Occupation Period, D, the Plaintiff’s fleet, was subject to the assessment of the instant land (the assessment date is unknown) and thereafter, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on June 12, 1942 in the name of E (E. D, the name of Chang C, July 29, 1941), followed the registration of ownership transfer under the name of E (E.D, the name of Chang C, the title of which was opened on July 29, 1941), and the registration of ownership transfer was completed on January 29, 1965 in the name of the Incorporated Corporation F (hereinafter “the instant Association”).

(3) On October 30, 1956, the above D died, and the family head’s inheritor inherited D’s property solely. On August 4, 1961, H transferred 3/7 of H’s property, and the Plaintiff, a family head’s inheritor, jointly succeeded 1/7 of H’s property, and on April 26, 1996, the Plaintiff, the family head’s heir, transferred 1/4 of H’s property, respectively.

On March 29, 2007, the Plaintiff, J, K, and L drafted a written agreement on the division of inherited property with the content that the Plaintiff would independently inherit the instant land.

(4) On the other hand, around May 1942, juveniles were accommodated in G (An island located on the N right) where the instant land is located.

(5) The above facts do not conflict between the parties, or may be acknowledged by each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 9, and Eul evidence No. 1 (including separate entries) and the purport of the whole pleadings, and there is no evidence that interferes with this.

2. Group upon the plaintiff's request;

A. On January 23, 1942, the Plaintiff’s assertion was made to create a juvenile reformatory in G. The Association was launched on January 23, 1942, and the entire G land including the instant land was demoted from around that time to February 1943.

arrow