Text
In the case of the violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, a fine of 600,000 won shall be imposed, and each of the crimes shall be punished.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months for the crime of interference with business and insult at the Seoul Northern District Court on February 4, 2016 and for the same year.
8.4. The execution of the sentence was completed in the prison.
"2017 Highest 3545"
1. From around April 29, 2017, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) from around 23:30 minutes to around 10 minutes; (b) while being drunk at a police box, a government office located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, C, the Defendant 10 minutes; (c) went to the police station without any special reason; (d) repeatedly approaching the police station; and (e) repeatedly talked with the police officer, and (e) went to the police station, and (e) went to the police station, and (e) went to the police station, the Defendant 10 minutes later passed away from the police station with a very rough speech and behavior.
2. On April 30, 2017, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the front side of a vehicle from which a imprison female is unable to drive without any justifiable reason on the front side of the Seoul Southern-gu E-ro, Seoul; and (b) thereby, the Victim F (58 years old) prevents the victim from driving the vehicle in front of that vehicle.
“Along with the string of the victim,” the victim’s flaps were flapsed and flapsed twice by drinking.
"2017 Highest 4286"
1. On October 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received a 112 report to the effect that “the victim would escape from scam and scam for scam” located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul; (b) on October 1, 2017, the Defendant: (c) received a request from the police officer of the Seoul Central Guard Police Station D (33 years old); (d) received a request to return home with clothes from G (33 years old); and (d) took a bath to “brut scam for scamscam”; and (d) committed assault by the police officer of the same patrol box at his hand, despite the request for returning home, he stored the chest of H(23 years old) who belongs to the same police officer of the same patrol box at one time, and did so.
Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.
2. The Defendant returned home from the police officers called out after receiving a report of the suspect 112 at the date, time, and place set forth in paragraph 1.