1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The contents asserted by the Plaintiffs in the trial of the first instance are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the Plaintiffs in the trial of the first instance, and even if the evidence submitted in the first instance and the trial of the first instance are examined, the judgment of the first instance court rejecting such assertion is justifiable.

Accordingly, the reasoning of the judgment of the court on this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts, and thus, this Court cites it in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(However, the part against the joint plaintiff D in the first instance judgment was separated and confirmed as above, except for the corresponding part, the part is that "Plaintiffs" in the second 2th 17th 2th th 17th son in the first instance judgment is "Plaintiffs and joint plaintiff D in the first instance trial," each of the remaining "Plaintiffs" is "Plaintiffs and joint plaintiff D in the first instance trial," and each "Plaintiff D" is "joint plaintiff D in the first instance trial," respectively. [The part used after dismissal] 4th 13th 4th 13th 13th 4th 13th 13th 13th 13th 2th 2th 2nd

The defendants in the 7th instance judgment of the first instance court are as follows: "Defendant I" in the 14th sentence and 17th sentence and "Defendant I" in the 19th sentence as "I"; "Defendant J, K" in the 14th sentence and 16th sentence, and "Defendant J, and the 16th sentence" in the 16th sentence as "J and K" respectively.

The “189(A)” of the first instance judgment is deemed to be “189,224(A).” Each of the “Defendant side” of the first instance judgment 9, 13, and 16 is deemed to be “the side of the Seoul Northern District Office” respectively. The “written survey” of the first instance judgment 9, 4, 6, 8, and 9 is deemed to be “the side of the Seoul Northern District Office”. The “written survey” of the first instance judgment 10, 16 of the first instance judgment 10, 12 of the first instance judgment 12, 11 through 12 of the first instance judgment is deemed to be “the Plaintiff.” The “Defendant” of the first instance judgment 12, 12 of the first instance judgment 12, 13, and 16 is deemed to be “the Defendant,” and the details of the disposition regarding “C” in the list of “Disposition” attached to the first instance judgment 15-4, 284(A).