The plaintiffs' appeal against the defendants and the plaintiffs' claims expanded by this court are dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows (excluding the part of the deceased’s claim for lost profit). Thus, this case is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. On the fourth and fourth 6th tier of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part that is dismissed or added, “the defendant was present” as “the defendant joining the defendant.”

8 pages 11 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be the case concerning "accomonion" in the judgment of first instance.

The 9th page 13 of the judgment of the first instance is the Plaintiff’s “Plaintiff”.

The 9th judgment of the first instance court was followed by the 17th judgment.

The following shall be added between 10, 13 and 14:

5) The evidence submitted by the Plaintiffs alone that the second disciplinary action and personnel announcement of the instant case were solely aimed at identifying the Deceased at the workplace.

It is insufficient to recognize that there was a collective harassment by the employees of the Defendants against the Deceased, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

A person shall be appointed.

3. In conclusion, the part of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning the claim for consolation money is justifiable. Thus, the plaintiffs' appeal against the defendants and the plaintiffs' claim expanded by this court are dismissed in entirety as it is without merit. It is so decided as per