1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including costs incurred by participation in the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the following among the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, and it is identical to the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the defendant adds the judgment as to the matters alleged in the court of first instance as set forth in paragraph (2) above, and thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of

Part 2, "Rules on the Selection of Candidates for Appointment of the President of Cuniversity (hereinafter referred to as the "Rules on the Selection") shall be construed as "Rules on the Selection of Candidates for Appointment of President of Cuniversity (before repealed by Regulation No. 2215, Feb. 23, 2018; hereinafter referred to as the "Rules on the Selection")".

2. 11 of the Decree on the Appointment of Educational Officials (amended by Presidential Decree No. 27372, Jul. 26, 2016; hereinafter referred to as the "former Decree on the Appointment of Educational Officials") shall be appointed.

The rejection of the appointment of the case at 3th 14th e.g. "proving the appointment of this case" shall be deemed "proving the appointment of this case".

The Decree on the Appointment of Educational Officials in 3rd, 9th, 10th, 14th, 20th, and 12th, 10th, and 16th, shall be appointed as the "Appointment of Educational Officials".

Each "Management Committee" of 4, 7, 6, 6, 8, 20 and 9, shall be raised to "Selection Management Committee".

4. The 21st degree of "sea village" shall be changed to "existing".

Each "Witness" of the 5th parallel 8th parallel 7th parallel 16th parallel 16th parallel 16th parallel 209.

7 pages 11 through 14 are as follows. Since it is difficult to view that the university of this case expressed its intention to withdraw the existing recommendation, it cannot be deemed that the effect of the existing recommendation, which was made through legitimate procedures, has ceased to exist due to the refusal to recommend the appointment of the president of this case, the Intervenor’s request for re-election, etc.

7. The 18th class "The Professor Association of this case" shall be deemed to be "the Professor Association of this case".

8 Myeon 10 to 14 shall be referred to in Article 24 (4) of the Public Educational Officials Decree on the Appointment of the Gu Educational Officials.