A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as a Chinese member, conspiredd to commit the phishing fraud with a person who takes the role of “collection” to collect money from the victim of fraud under the direction of an employee of the “Sishing”, and who is a person in charge of collecting money from the victim of fraud, along with his/her name and the “C”, etc.

The crime of phishing fraud is committed by misrepresenting the prosecutor, the staff of the Financial Supervisory Service, etc. at the call center so that the victims may deliver money to “collection books” and the victims may share their respective roles by remitting the money received from the victims from “collection books” to “total books” in China through “transfer books.”

1. 사기 미수 피고인은 2017. 8. 10. 11:00 경 중국 길림성 연길 시에 있는 옌지 차 오 양 촨 진 공항에 서 보이스 피 싱 조직원인 ‘C ’로부터 ‘ 금융범죄 금융 계좌 추적 민원’ 이라는 제목의 문서 10여 장, 삼성 갤 럭 시 A8 스마트 폰 1대를 교부 받으면서 “ 피해자를 만나면 금융감독원 대리라고 소개하고, 앞으로 스마트 폰 애플리케이션 ‘ 위 챗’ 을 통해 지시하는 대로 행 동해라.

“The instructions were received”.

On August 17, 2017, 200, the employees of Bosing T, “C,” etc. continued to have been provided cash from the victim D through a false female collection book by misrepresenting the public prosecutor belonging to the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor’s Office on August 17, 2017, and then called the victim on August 17, 2017 and called the victim on August 19, 2017.

D Withdrawal of money in the account in the name of another C, and acceptance of the withdrawn money from the account to the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service, and confirmation as to whether a bank employee who made a withdrawal of money to D was related to the case, will return money again.

Although it is false in front of the Seoul New Elementary School, the lower court stated that the Plaintiff sent the money that the employees of the Financial Supervisory Service withdrawn from the Republic of Korea. However, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine.