logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.04.05 2017고정1850
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 14, 2016, the Defendant: “Around 2017, 1851, the Defendant visited the Internet Nene Ethber Ethmbook; “Dr. Dr., unlike the previous representative before Dr. had resigned at the same time, has reversed the same; thus, he emphasized this and requested submission of a letter of resignation; and then, the Defendant released from the office by deceiving Dr. Dr., who expressed desire to go to the principal with bad and bad food, and who left the office.

The phrase “the victim’s reputation was damaged by disclosing public facts via an information and communications network for the purpose of slandering the victim’s D by posting the word “the resident’s perusal,” thereby impairing the victim’s reputation.

"2017 High 1852"

1. Violation of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc.;

A. On October 3, 2016, the Defendant had access to the Internet NVV’s “E resident car page” by the Internet NAVV on the 01:08 Blux, and had not been engaged in any activity to monitor the activities of the residents of G apartment or to act for the occupant representative committee, the Defendant appears to have played an I’s role as the chief of the security office of our apartment complex 1, and it appears that the FFC has played an I’s role as the head of the security office of our apartment complex 1, and it is worth monitoring the number of the above publicity materials, such as the large seat, and the fluxur’s fluoral activities.

The expression ", through the information and communications network, damaged the honor of the victim by disclosing false information openly with an intention to defame the victim."

B. The Defendant refers to the above victim in the above car page around the same day and posted a letter stating, “This section has a representative of the tenant in J Apartment apartment twice and has been punished by a fine of KRW 500,000,000 in violation of the Enforcement Decree of the Housing Act, but seems to have succeeded to his/her office,” thereby slandering the victim.

arrow