logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.05.12 2017고정543
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On September 30, 2015, the Defendant, who committed the crime, committed on September 30, 2015, was dissatisfied with the victim C, who was working together with the victim C, who was working as the epoch-based source for the “Scam-based game” game in Gangdong-gu Seoul, Seoul, on September 30, 2015, using the title “D” in the public bulletin board inside the above official game website, using the title “(s) epoch-based epoch-based epoch-based epoch-based epoch-based epoch-based 200,000 won,” and was unable to repay the said epoch-based epos.g., “D.”

t. Subsequent to the complaint, there is no knowledge of how to do so, and now the game is sold to the account and opened to another account.

A. The phrase “LS S Spos” was inserted in the word “Ausspos” in the word “Ausspos” in the word “Ausspos.”

In fact, however, the victim did not have any contact with the victim by borrowing 200,000 won in cash.

Accordingly, the defendant abused the victim's reputation by disclosing false information through information and communications networks with a view to slandering the victim.

B. On September 1, 2016, the Defendant, on September 1, 2016, filed a complaint with the victim under the Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B and 101 that criticizes and frequents the Defendant on the online market. On his Twitter (F), the Defendant found that the Defendant was Greg that he was a body to borrow money of KRW 300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won for the birth gift of the Republic of Korea on September 1, 2016, and that he was a military unit at the time of his Twitter (F).

Even if he wishes to be a food for another person, he did not want to do so, but was laundry and clean.

The search must be done in the name of the person.

A notice was posted with the content “......”

In fact, however, the victim did not have any contact with the victim by borrowing 300,000 won in cash.

Accordingly, the defendant's false information openly through the information and communication network with an intention to defame the victim.

arrow