[Defendant A and B] Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for two years and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

[Defendant C, D, E, F].

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On July 13, 2011, Defendant G was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in one year and six months of imprisonment at the Gwangju District Court due to a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective act, a deadly weapon, etc.) and the said judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

[B] The government of Jeonnam-do, in 2009, provided subsidies on the condition that farmers and farming corporations performing the project will bear a certain ratio of their own charges, focusing on water-source protection areas or areas in need of practice of environment-friendly agriculture in order to preserve the agricultural environment and build a production system for high quality agricultural products.

According to the above government policy, Jeonnam-do established a support plan around Jan. 17, 2008 and selected a business operator eligible for subsidies on or around Oct. 17, 2008, who provided subsidies, supervision, etc. in Korea-do, 2009 (hereinafter “the subsidized project of this case”) with subsidies, supervision, etc., the 20% of the project cost is borne by the subsidized business operator (hereinafter “self-payment”) and the remainder of the project cost is 80% subsidized by the State and local governments (Do, Gun), and the subsidized business operator submitted evidentiary documents, etc. that the subsidized business operator shared self-payment to receive the above subsidies.

1. Tagricultural partnership related to T&A (hereinafter “T farming corporation”) is a corporation established on January 13, 2009 by farmers residing in Yan-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and then on January 13, 2009. Defendant C is the representative director of T&A.

T farm corporations did not have the ability to pay contributions as a subsidy program operator of the instant subsidy program due to the lack of its members' contributions in cash at the time of its establishment on January 13, 2009.

On the other hand, Defendant A.