beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and each of the defendants B and C shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of eight months.
However, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. From around 2010 to the third L business, the time when the foundation fact was found was found, the State subsidy was paid as part of the third L business, and the “N District Center development project (O center building construction project; hereinafter “the first subsidized project”) and “PP development project (hereinafter “the second subsidized project”).
The Q Saemaul community was selected as a subsidy program operator of the primary subsidy program on February 2, 201, and from March 201 to February 2013, 201, received total project cost of KRW 912,931,00 (the national expense of KRW 639,100,00) from leisure cities and received the construction of the O center building from the local government, and was selected as a subsidy program operator of the secondary subsidy program on March 201, and from March 2011 to February 2013, it received total project cost of KRW 1 billion (the national expense of KRW 70,000,000) from the local government and received total project cost of KRW 1 billion (the national expense of KRW 70,000,000) from February 2013.
2. Defendants A as the chairperson of the promotional group of primary and secondary subsidized projects from May 2010 to April 2016 led the above subsidized projects, such as application for subsidies, designation of construction business operators, and implementation of subsidies.
Defendant
B and Defendant C were public officials belonging to female viewing, who are in charge of the management and supervision of the primary and secondary subsidized projects.
3. Although Defendant A’s executor did not receive subsidies by means of false application or other unlawful means, the Defendant notified that Q Saemaul Association was selected as a primary subsidy program and a secondary subsidy program operator from the Han-si around March 201 and around February 201, Defendant A, but the village residents received money in return for the selection from the companies that want not to bear the contributions and received the contributions from the companies that want to select as a construction company, etc. of the defective subsidy program, and received the contributions from such companies.
(1) relating to the primary subsidy program;