logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.05.15 2019고단692
뇌물공여
Text

Defendant

B A person shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the above punishment against Defendant B for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On July 13, 2018, Defendant A was indicted for the crime of offering of bribe and the crime of interference with bidding at the Seoul Central District Court and was detained on September 5, 2018, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 9, 2019.

【Criminal Act】

1. The defendants as well as related persons are the representative director of C (hereinafter referred to as the "C") established for the purpose of maintaining a computer system, construction of information and communications systems, etc., and the defendant B is the head of the Sarn Project (business director), and D was working as the person in charge of the operation of the E work support group system and the computer network management (land-gun commercial company).

2. The Defendants’ co-principal D worked for the Ministry of Information and Communications from December 22, 2010 to the E Work Support Division as a data network management department, and was in charge of the operation and management of various network equipment used by E and regionalF, and supervision of construction works during replacement work.

The Defendants gathered to offer entertainment to D in charge of construction supervision, etc. in relation to “G business” in 2015, which was ordered by E. Accordingly, from July 2, 2015 to July 3, 2015, Defendant B offered entertainment equivalent to KRW 957,500 (person 1,915,000,000) to D, including food, service, etc., in the future construction process, with the purport that the Defendants are able to receive various conveniences, such as tallying at the restaurant in Gangnam-gu and the entertainment drinking house in Seoul.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to give a bribe in relation to the duties of public officials.

3. Defendant A’s criminal defendant offered entertainment to D in charge of construction supervision, etc. through the Ctechnical Director J in relation to “G business” in 2017, which was ordered by the C&C, and accordingly, the J as a result, upon the construction of “G business” in 2017, provides convenience, such as not taking issue even if the number of inputs is less than the number of inputs stated in the initial proposal at the time of the construction of “G business”, and the L’s entertainment, etc., equivalent to KRW 392,00 (1,76,000/3) from “K” and “L,” to the effect that the number of inputs stated in the initial proposal is less than the number of inputs.

arrow