beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
Reasons
1. The plaintiff's argument that the cafeteria employee C in the restaurant operated by the defendant did not keep the food ordered by the plaintiff in front of the plaintiff, and placed it on the table in the strings, and the plaintiff's direct possession of the food, which led to the investment of hot food to the plaintiff. Accordingly, the plaintiff suffered pictures in his hand, arms, etc.
A restaurant employee should provide food in front of the orderer in the case of receiving the order of the customer, and even at the other places, C violated the duty of safety consideration as an employee of such restaurant. As such, the Defendant is obligated to compensate the Plaintiff as an employer for damages incurred by the accident (=475,730,000,000 won for early treatment).
2. In full view of the statements in Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 7, and the purport of Gap's testimony and arguments as witnesses D, the plaintiff ordered the plaintiff to enter a restaurant operated by the defendant on March 19, 2016, which was ordered to send to E to the plaintiff. The defendant's employees C sent food ordered by the plaintiff to the plaintiff's company in front of the plaintiff's company's company. The plaintiff's company saw the plaintiff's juging juging juging juging juging juging jus, which was 4% of the body part of the plaintiff's body (hereinafter "the accident of this case"). The plaintiff paid 4,75,730 won as medical expenses for the above image (hereinafter "the accident of this case"), and the plaintiff paid 4,75,730 won as medical expenses for the above image.
However, the following circumstances, which can be seen by comprehensively taking account of the aforementioned evidence, evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including the number of branch numbers) and the overall purport of the pleadings, namely, ① after completing a mountain, the Plaintiff visited the Defendant’s restaurant by drinking a day and drinking, and C was in a string state, such as talking about a day-to-day and drinking at the time of the delivery of food, or drinking a each other; ② C put a string to the Plaintiff’s line.