Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 400,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Punishment of the crime

On August 10, 2014, the Defendants visited the F restaurant located in Geman-si E operated by the victim D on August 10, 2014.

The Defendants ordered food food to restaurant employees G by sitting in the table No. 13 of restaurant No. 13, and employees G caused strings to the just of the just of the ship, and the Defendants opened the just of the just of the just of the ship to the just of the just of the just of the just of the ship in the course of laying the just of the just of the just of the ship to the just of the just of the just of the ship, the just of the just of the ship in the just of the ship, and the just of the just of the Defendant B’s body.

The victim D visited the H hospital, a special video treatment hospital, along with the victim B, to receive medical treatment. For about 10 days thereafter, the victim D visited the H hospital, along with the victim B, and paid hospital expenses and transportation expenses to the hospital instead of the victim B.

Since then, Defendant B demanded the victim to pay the hospital treatment expenses and the maximum amount of taxi expenses after receiving school treatment at the mixed H hospital. Accordingly, the victim expressed his opinion that “ why is the taxi expense is larger than the medical treatment expenses, why is the nearest hospital is treated, why is the taxi expense is much higher than 10,00 won per day, and the transportation expenses are less than 10,000 won per day,” and refused to pay hospital expenses and medical treatment expenses. The Defendants visited the F restaurant operated by the victim to receive the hospital expenses and the taxi expenses.

On September 25, 2014, from around 20:00 on the same day to around 20:30 on the same day, the Defendants visited the F restaurant located in Geman-si E, and even though they are aware that many customers were eating in the restaurant table, Defendant A would sit in the table table among the restaurants, and said, Defendant A would be deemed to be “whether the victim would have no telephone.”