logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2018.01.10 2017가단53046
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 500,000 to Plaintiff A, KRW 1,00,000 to Plaintiff B, and KRW 2,00,000 to Plaintiff C, respectively.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. At around 14:30 on January 12, 2017, Plaintiffs A, B, and C, who are their ancillarys, made two parts of the restaurant run by Defendant D, which was located in the Gangseo-won F, and put in food in the room. 2) During the restaurant, Defendant E, the wife of Defendant D, received the two parts of the two parts of the two parts of the restaurant and the two parts of the two parts of the restaurant, and received the two parts of the two parts of the Plaintiff C (the age of 8 at that time), while putting in front of the table of the Plaintiff C (the age of 8), and suffered the images of both descendants, both of them.

(hereinafter referred to as the "accident of this case"). / [Grounds for recognition] Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, 8, and Eul evidence Nos. 1, 17 (including paper numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, Defendant E is a negligent tort, and Defendant D is an employer of Defendant E, and is liable for damages suffered by the Plaintiffs due to the instant accident.

C. On the other hand, in light of the aforementioned facts and the statements and images of the evidence Nos. 2, 3, 9, and 11 (including paper numbers) as seen earlier, the plaintiffs are also obligated to pay due attention to prevent the occurrence of an accident in which significant food is injected up until the transport of food is completed if the employees provide food in front of them (such as this case, if the employees are accompanied by children and use this restaurant, the accident should be prevented). Thus, the plaintiff's error was caused by the occurrence and expansion of damage caused by the accident of this case.

Therefore, the defendants' responsibilities are limited to 80%.

2. Scope of liability for damages

A. Plaintiff C’s lost income Plaintiffs are inferred to Plaintiff C’s appearance, which is a minor female.

arrow