The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who has served as a customer to "B", and the victim C (the remaining, the age of 20) is a person who works from "B" to be an employee.

The Defendant, from around 22:40 on February 2, 2017 to around 23:00 on the same day, refused to calculate the account on the ground that the Defendant was fluorous within “B” located in Heung-gu D at the time of Cheongju, thereby refusing to do so. After calculating, the Defendant was fluoring the account at a large place of customers, such as fluor, fluor, bitch fluor, bitch fluor, bitch fluor, bitch fluor.

“The age is several homicides” and “the grow up.”

네 가 나랑 뜨면 이길 거 같아 ’, ‘ 야, 경찰 부르려면 불러 봐, 나는 깽판치고 가면 그만이야.

In a large sense, the victim publicly insultingd the victim, such as “I e.,” etc.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 311 of the Criminal Act;

(b) An offense subject to prosecution upon complaint: Article 312 (1) of the Criminal Act.

C. Declaration of withdrawal of complaint: on August 1, 2017, after the institution of this case was indicted, a written agreement is submitted to the effect that the withdrawal of complaint is made in this court.

(d) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act;