logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.12.22 2017고정1003
전기공사업법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is an electrical construction business operator who runs electrical construction business on the trade name of F Co., Ltd. on the second floor E in light of his name.

No constructor shall subcontract electrical construction works he/she has contracted to another constructor.

On February 2, 2015, the Defendant agreed to pay KRW 74 million out of the construction cost and subcontracted the construction work to the representative of the I Co., Ltd. who is another electricity business operator even though the Defendant was awarded a contract for H (Contract Price: KRW 128,689,000) awarded a contract with the Gu office of Seongbuk-si.

2. Defendant B is an electrical construction business operator who operates electrical construction business under the trade name of Defendant B from 101 to 101 of J building in Sungnam-si.

No constructor shall subcontract electrical construction works he/she has contracted to other constructors, and no constructor shall receive a subcontract therefor.

A. K is an electrical construction business operator who runs the electrical construction business in the name of “M” from the Suwon-si L and the first floor of Suwon-si, and received a contract by receiving the N (N Contract Price: KRW 104,778,000) awarded a contract on February 2, 2014.

around that time, the Defendant was awarded a subcontract for the above N in the above M office with K awarded a successful bid.

B. On February 2015, the Defendant was awarded a subcontract for the said H to another electrical construction business entity at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Partial statement of the witnessO;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police to K;

1. Copy of the protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against P;

1. Statement made by the police against theO;

1. A detailed statement of accounts;

1. Each investigation report (a false registration as a successful bidder's employee and attaching a copy of documents related to construction, such as the method of crime investigation, the starting date, etc., which relate to illegal subcontracting) (a) Defendant A, recognized by the evidence mentioned above, has contracted from the Gu office in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and the reasons why Defendant B has been performing the above construction.

arrow