The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of the grounds for appeal;

A. As to the act of assault, the Defendant does not have to see the part of the victim E’s left shoulder.

B. As to the refusal to leave, the Defendant agreed to hold a meeting with the chief secretary of C University through L in advance, and visited the secretary room. There was no speech from E to say that “E” was “E,” and even if E made the above remarks, this outline is required to leave.

shall not fall under the Gu.

In addition, since the secretary office of C University president is the ordinary property of the school juristic person, and the defendant who is the same as C University graduate school is allowed to enter, the defendant is required to leave.

There is no obligation to respond to the Gu, and E is merely an employee employed by a school juristic person and leaves the defendant.

There is no authority to conduct the Gu.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court, the following facts can be acknowledged.

The Defendant visited the Director of C University, a 49-year graduate group at C University administrative graduate schools, to interview the Chief Director of C University with respect to the leakage of petition documents submitted by M to the C University Educational Foundation regarding disciplinary action against C University professors. On the day of the instant case, the Defendant visited the Office of Secretary of C University.

At the time, the chief secretary of C University was in the state of keeping the job.

The Defendant argued that “the chief of the secretariat is going to go to the front,” and “to deliver the necessary documents to the front,” from the staff G of the Seocho Office, the Defendant continued to stay in the Seocho Office while raising the speech to G and put the seat of the chief of the secretariat.

The staff E in the book room at the time called G to ask G to record the conversation, etc. with the Defendant, and the police, G to keep an interview with the chief of the book office even though the Defendant and the Defendant did not promise to do so.