logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2013.09.06 2013고정247
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the person who is responsible for the chairperson of the representative council of occupants of C Apartment 1 Complex.

The Defendant had expressed comments against the Defendant on “E” website (hereinafter referred to as the “instant site”) after the Internet that the victim collected by apartment occupants, and had the Defendant display comments to slander the victim accordingly.

On August 7, 2011, at around 23:10, the Defendant posted a letter “Adi F” on the said website on August 7, 2011, and on August 22:41, 201, the Defendant prepared and posted the text “I am am hye at the conference of the 10th of August and at the meeting of the 10th of August, 2011.” The Defendant also posted the letter “and at the same time, I am hye at the meeting of the am hye at the meeting of the amhye at this time the amhye at this time the amhye.” (hereinafter referred to as the “instant comments”).

However, there was no fact that the victim was 20% discount from the contractor or was unfairly suspended from paying the sale price.

Nevertheless, the Defendant posted a false statement in a public manner through an information and communications network with an intent to defame the victim without confirming any specific factual relations, thereby impairing the honor of the victim.

2. The comments of this case are written comments on the car page that the apartment occupants of this case gather. The party who can read the above comments is limited to the Internet users who have joined the car page among the above apartment occupants, and the amount is limited to a few degree, and the contents are also limited to the defendant who is the chairman of the council of occupants' representatives of the above apartment.

arrow