logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.08.30 2016가단30649
토지인도
Text

1. Defendant (Appointed Party) B and Appointed C are the Plaintiff.

A. Attached Form (1) of the 275m2,00 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000,000

Reasons

1. The facts of recognition are: (a) the Plaintiff is each owner of 275.8 square meters and E 89 square meters in Jeonju-si, Jeonju-si; (b) the Appointed-dong No. 101 of F located in F located in the above land; (c) the Plaintiff, a sectional owner under subparagraph 101 of the first floor A located in F located in the above land; (d) the Defendant (Appointed Party) and B and the Selection Party C (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendants”) simultaneously run the same in the above building; and (e) the Defendant and the Selection Party C (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendants”), without title in the course of operation of the said seeds, do not have a joint fence with each point of the above land; (a) the steel fence was installed on the line connected with each point of the above land; (b) the aforementioned drawings indicated in attached Table No. 1-6, 12, 13, and 400 square meters; and (c) each part of the above list or evidence attached to each part of the above land included in the above list No.27 or evidence.

2. According to the facts found in the judgment as to the cause of the claim, the Defendants are obligated to remove the aforementioned fences to the Plaintiff, collect each above ground from the Plaintiff, and deliver each above part of the above land.

3. The defendants' assertion as to the defendants' assertion that since the designated parties C have a right to a site concerning each of the above land, they cannot respond to the plaintiff's claim.

Since there is no evidence to acknowledge the above assertion, the defendants' assertion is without merit.

4. Accordingly, we accept all the Plaintiff’s claims on the grounds of the conclusion.

arrow