1. The defendant is against the plaintiff (appointed party).

A. Of the 400 square meters in Gangnam-si, Gangnam-si, the attached drawing marks 6, 7, 17, 16, 15, and 6 are as follows.

In full view of the statements in the evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 17, 16, 15, and 6 of the Map Nos. 1-2 and the result of the on-site inspection by this court, the fact that the Defendant installed a wooden fence on the part of “A” part of “A” connected with each of the points of the 4, 5, 6, 14, 13, and 4 of the Map Nos. 4, 5, 6, 155 square meters (hereinafter “D land”) owned by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party”) and the Appointed Party Nos. 6, 7, 17, 16, 15, and 6 of the Map No. 400 square meters connected to each of the above parts of the land, unless there is a legitimate title to possess each of the above parts, the Defendant is obligated to remove the relevant parts of the land and deliver them to the Plaintiff (party).

The plaintiffs seek against the defendant the removal of the drainage pipes laid underground in the part 3 square meters of “C” portion of the attached Form No. 11, 12, 13, 14, and 11, which connects each point of the attached Form No. 11, 12, 13, 14, and 11, and also deliver the relevant land. However, there is no evidence to prove that the defendant occupied the above part of the land by laying

Therefore, the plaintiff (appointed party)'s claim is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and it is decided as per Disposition by applying the main text of Article 101 and Article 213 of the Civil Procedure Act to the burden of litigation costs and the declaration of provisional execution.