logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2014.10.23 2014고정1000
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 3, 2011, the Defendant leased 20 million won from D as a broker of the Victim C (F Licensed Real Estate Agent Office in Suwon-gu, Busan Metropolitan City) from D to KRW 500,000,000,000,000 for monthly rent. However, upon termination of the above lease contract, the Defendant was refunded KRW 10,000,000,000 after deducting eight million won for unpaid monthly rent from D from the lease deposit around January 26, 2014. In order to receive a refund from the Victim and D in dispute over the settlement of accounts, the Defendant was drinking to interfere with the Victim’s business of licensed real estate agents by taking putting cocks in front of the “F Licensed Real Estate Agent Office” of the Victim’s operation in Suwon-gu, Busan Metropolitan City, and taking part in writing. A.

On January 26, 2014, from around 16:00 to 18:00 on the same day, the Defendant stated the kicket stating the F Licensed Real Estate Agent’s Office of the Victim’s Operation in Suwon-gu, Busan, Busan, as “F Real Estate Agent’s Office of the F Licensed Real Estate Agent’s Office” to the effect that “The F Licensed Real Estate Agent’s Office is a malicious real estate broker who does not refund the security deposit.”

As a result, the defendant, by pointing out facts, has harmed the reputation of the victim and interfered with the operation of the real estate agent office of the victim by force.

B. On January 27, 2014, the Defendant, at the office of the above F Licensed Real Estate Agent, stated in Chapter 3 “F Real Estate Agent’s Office” in white paper, and posted it on the window of the above office so that many, unspecified persons can view it.

As a result, the defendant, by pointing out facts, has harmed the reputation of the victim and interfered with the operation of the real estate agent office of the victim by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the police interrogation protocol of the defendant

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with business) of the corresponding Act on the crime, and the Criminal Act;

arrow