A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 2014, the Defendant was scheduled from August 201 to August 201 to construct a road following the Hamyeong-gu Ham-dong X-si Park at the regular flag retail shop operated by the victim D, the victim D, who was in Pyeongtaek-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun.

I wish to deliver the soil to be used for the soil reclamation work, and it is the information that is known only to the mixed person, facing the chief of the office of the Ham-gu Office.

On August 2014, the term “a contract deposit of KRW 10 million, which is necessary to purchase Hamyeong-gun E mountain, to supply soil to be used for reclamation work in around 2014, would be KRW 120,000,000,000, out of KRW 24,000,000,000 from the regional economic division of the Hamyeong-gun Office around August 2015.”

However, there is no fact that the defendant has face-to-face with the head of the office of the office of the Hagu-gun, and there was no intention or ability to receive KRW 240 million after purchasing Masan and supplying soil to the office of the Hagu-gun.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and received KRW 10 million from the injured party as the purchase contract deposit around August 9, 2014.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. The Defendant, on November 2014, refers to the Defendant’s Yari-gun C, which was operated by the said victim, to the Defendant, along with the head of the Gun office F division in the Hamyeong-gun Fari-si Hamsan, in the Mampo-si Hambba Hampo-si Hampo-si.

Among many construction enterprises, G has ordered the above high pipe reclamation works, and the head of the Gun test shall grant the price for the receipt thereof.

The purport was that, upon investing KRW 30 million in G due to its shortage of funds, G would make it possible to recover KRW 470 million from G in the future, if G would have paid the price to the head of Pyeongtaek-gu Gun with the said money, and if any profit arises in the future.

However, in fact, the defendant did not face with the number of Hampyeong-gun, G did not exist, and even if he ordered to reclaim the pipe of Hamsan in the same way or received the investment from the injured party, the agreed profits.