Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and two months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of ten months.

However, as to the Defendants, this is against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A and Defendant B invested from around 2008 in the name of the person in the vicinity of the project for collecting earth and stones, but the project was not run at all, so they received demand for the return of the investment, the new investors received money and valuables from the new investors as the investment funds for the project for collecting earth and stones and offered them to appropriate them for the repayment of the damage.

Defendant

B From 3 parts of G ignsung Factory assembly in F around April 2010, the victim H “A has been aware of a large amount of money about this land,” and there is a development project with A.

There is good land in I, with the permission for the collection of earth and stones cut, and the soil can be sold to the military unit and the soil can be developed up to be cut up with the soil.

H. Hasung-si will purchase and make an investment in developing H. Ha. 3-6 months, two times the investment amount may be punished.

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, since the land of I, including the above JJ fields, was located in areas where development activities were restricted due to agricultural and forest areas, water supply protection areas, etc., so it was not possible to obtain permission to collect earth and stone, and thus, it was not possible to conclude a contract to supply earth and stone to the U.S. military base. Therefore, even if the money was paid from the injured party, there was no intention or ability to distribute profits equivalent

The Defendants received KRW 30 million from the damaged party to the Agricultural Cooperative Account under Defendant B’s name on April 28, 2010, and received KRW 40 million in total from the same account on May 7, 2010, and transferred KRW 70 million in total as investment.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to attract the victim to receive property from the injured party.

Defendant A of the 2016 Highest 914, who is the nominal owner of K's land at Ansan-si, is the nominal owner of the land at Ansan-si, for the construction of the land at around August 4, 2007.