logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.09.07 2018고합456
부정처사후수뢰등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months and fine of twenty thousand won,00,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of ten months.

Defendant

A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was appointed as Grade 9 to a local public official facility position at C on October 1, 1991. From August 28, 2015, from around D planning policy to August 28, 2015, it was in charge of selling, leasing, managing, and reclaiming D-owned land from the Land Site Sale Team to Grade 6 competent officials. Defendant B sought land to be reclaimed and obtained profits from dumping soil from the neighboring construction site (25 tons of dump truck from KRW 25,00 to KRW 35,00).

1. From January 201 to October 2017, Defendant A received request from B to “to allow the exclusive use of idle lands owned by G to the landfill site” from F D’s land, etc. located in E from around January 2017 to October 2017, Defendant A, upon receipt of a request from B, ordered B to perform reclamation works on 11 idle lands, such as E site size E (79,109 square meters), as shown in the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes, and ordered B to perform construction works without obtaining approval from the head of the policy planning division in case of eight of them.

After that, on November 20, 2017, the Defendant received KRW 20 million from B to H bank account (J) in the name of the Defendant’s borrowed account under the name of recompense from around 09:55.

As a result, the Defendant, who is a public official, received a bribe after committing an unlawful act.

2. Defendant B, upon request from A as described in paragraph 1, ordered reclamation works on the 11st idle site to be ordered by the Defendant himself/herself, and then remitted KRW 20 million from the L account under the name of K, which is located in the name of 09:5 on November 20, 2017, to the I bank account under the name of A, which is the next name account in the name of H.

Accordingly, the defendant accepted a bribe in relation to his duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made with respect to M and N;

1. A copy of the investigation report (the result of the request for analysis of the seized B mobile phone digital evidence), a copy of resident registration, a family relation certificate, etc., and a investigation report (the confirmation of the details of G banking reclamation works).

arrow