1.(a)

Defendant D shall pay Plaintiff A KRW 3,00,000, and KRW 1,000,000 for each of the said money to Plaintiff B and C, and each of the said money.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff A (hereinafter referred to as “Industrial Support Group”)

(2) Defendant D is the head of the Industrial Support Group I and professors of H University I, and Defendant E is the representative director of J, Inc. participating in the Industrial Support Group.

3) Defendant Republic of Korea is its affiliate to the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (former Ministry of Knowledge Economy).

The Industrial Support Group is a foundation to contribute to the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy. On the other hand, H University is the F of the Defendant School Foundation (hereinafter “F”).

(B) The Plaintiff’s petition and its recommendations are higher education institutions established by the Plaintiff. (B) On October 25, 201, the Plaintiff filed a petition with the National Human Rights Commission of Korea to the effect that “In the course of continuously engaging in sexual harassment from Defendant D, who is a commercial member of the industrial support group, he/she was sexually sexually indecent act in singing room from Defendant E, the representative director of the company participating in the industrial support group.”

2) On June 19, 2012, the National Human Rights Commission of Korea rendered a decision on the recommendation that Plaintiff A received the Plaintiff’s assertion. (c) On November 14, 2011, Defendant D publicly damaged Defendant D’s reputation by publicly alleging that the Plaintiff A and B filed a complaint with Defendant D by stating that “for the purpose of having Plaintiff A and B were subject to criminal punishment, Defendant D would have been subject to criminal punishment.” However, the Daejeon District Prosecutors’ Office filed a complaint with Defendant A and B, but the Daejeon District Prosecutors’ Office rendered a non-prosecution disposition against Defendant D’s “not subject to criminal punishment.”

2) On November 11, 2011, Defendant E also filed a complaint with the Plaintiff A and B, stating that “The Plaintiff A and B had been subject to criminal punishment against Defendant E, by openly pointing out false facts that the Plaintiff A had sexually committed an indecent act from Defendant E, thereby damaging the honor of Defendant E.” However, the Daejeon District Prosecutors’ Office was also in its jurisdiction.