logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.08.22 2018나70424
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

(b).

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiffs are those in marital relations, and the defendants are those who slandered with other plaintiffs A while working in E.

B. On February 6, 2015, Defendant C told F, the seat of Plaintiff A, by telephone, that read “A New F, which caused G to get H. G to the left-out by the person G, and six members of the J agency in J agency in Category B, e.g., J agency in Category B. Since he was employed by J agency, G was seriously in the J agency, and it was difficult for this person to have contributed to the public.” The judgment became final and conclusive on June 9, 2017 by being sentenced to a fine on defamation on the part of Plaintiff B on the part of the person who intentionally damaged the reputation of Plaintiff B by openly pointing out facts, and was sentenced to a fine on defamation on June 9, 2017.

(T) Daegu District Court 2016 Gosi1892, Daegu District Court 2017No2603, Supreme Court 2018Do1220).

Defendant D posted the comments of the plaintiffs’ honor or insult in E from January 2, 2015 to March 2 of the same year as indicated in the separate facts constituting a crime. As such, the above summary order was issued on August 22, 2016 due to the offense of insult and violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation) and the offense of damaging the reputation of the plaintiffs by openly pointing out false facts against the plaintiffs A, and the above summary order became final and conclusive on January 2, 2017.

(Reasons for Recognition), entry of evidence Nos. 2 and 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings, without dispute (based on Recognition)

2. Determination as to the plaintiffs' claims

A. The fact that Defendant C intentionally defames Plaintiff C’s reputation by claiming for damages against Defendant C is as seen earlier. This constitutes tort against Plaintiff B under the Civil Act and thereby, Plaintiff B suffered emotional distress.

arrow