1. Plaintiff (Appointed Party) A, Defendant D’s KRW 3,00,000, and Defendant E’s 2,000,000 out of the said money jointly with Defendant D;

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The relationship between the parties (1) The plaintiff A is a member of the plaintiff church, and the designated members are the members of the plaintiff church.

Defendant D was the head of the Plaintiff church, and Defendant E was the wife of Defendant D, and Defendant F was the children of Defendant D.

(2) The dispute between Plaintiff A and Defendant D was continued since 2014 regarding the financial process, including the purchase cost of H land purchased to extend the Plaintiff church (hereinafter “instant land”), the operation method of Plaintiff A’s church including the resolution of withdrawal from the B religious organization (joint) assembly, etc.

B. Defendant D, E’s criminal punishment (1) as indicated in attached Table 1, Defendant D, and E were sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million on December 29, 2015, and a fine of KRW 1 million for Defendant E, respectively, on the grounds of the criminal facts that interfered with the worship transferred by Plaintiff A from around 10:30 on April 12, 2015 to 10:58 on the same day.

(B) The lower court’s appeal (2016No164) and appeal (2016Do13974) by the Defendants were all dismissed, and the said judgment became final and conclusive as it is.

(2) Defendant D and E, as indicated in attached Table No. 2, interfered with the worship transferred by Plaintiff A from around 10:00 to December 12:00 on April 19, 2015, and Defendant D, on May 4, 2014, decided KRW 254,00,000 on the purchase price of KRW 111 to approximately 90 members of the Plaintiff church. The conclusion of the down payment of KRW 49,000,000 is without evidentiary documents for KRW 49,00,000. Here, there is no evidentiary document for the down payment of KRW 49,00,00,000, and the thickness between wooden and administrative affairs are forced by a church to put about a position and what he had left to read a church.

B. On October 14, 2016, Defendant D was sentenced to a fine of KRW 300,000 and KRW 500,000 to Defendant E, respectively, for a crime that defames Plaintiff A by openly pointing out false facts by distributing a document stating that “Neman’s family, J N Ngrgr, Ngrgrgrgr’s home, and K Ngrgrgrgr’s home, etc.” (hereinafter “instant document”).