1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On February 17, 2010, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was discharged from military service on December 6, 201.

B. On September 17, 2014, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff was diagnosed with ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic e.

C. On January 7, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision that the instant difference does not constitute a person who rendered distinguished services to the State or a person eligible for veteran’s compensation, and notified the Plaintiff thereof, on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation with the performance of official duties.

[Reasons for Recognition] Evidence No. 1, Evidence No. 1, Evidence No. 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff asserted that he was enlisted in active service due to the lack of problems in the health of the Daejeon War. After the placement of the plaintiff, the plaintiff moved a considerable distance of time while working on the GOP boundary, and laid off more than 1,000 stairs. When working at night, the plaintiff was required to wear a heavy helicopter with a diameter attached to the projected gun, carried a hot shot gun with a large number of shot water or engine guns and carried a night duty. In the indoor computer in the course of performing administrative work on a computer, the plaintiff was in active service and carried a 1.15 km for a long time, wearing a shoulder and knife, with a little left hand, and the plaintiff was judged to have a shot disc as a result of the MRI shooting at the KOP Hospital on July 201, and the plaintiff was discharged from active service, and the plaintiff was discharged from active service after the expiration of the period.

Therefore, the Plaintiff is a person who rendered distinguished services to the State or a person eligible for veteran's compensation, as the Plaintiff suffered injuries in the military.

(b) the statement Nos. 1, 2, and 4 in the board, and the director of the Ansan University of Korea-U.S. expert witness of this Court.