logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.05.13 2019구단6875
국가유공자요건비해당결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's primary and conjunctive claims are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 5, 2016, the Plaintiff entered the Army, and entered the Army in the National Army Education Team at the 26th Sick Education Team, in which she was infresh and pains near the right leged bones during the training for new illness, and was infreshed on December 19, 2016 at the National Armed Forces Hospital on December 26, 2016, and was infreshed on January 19, 2017, and was diagnosed as the composition and frame of the advanced team at the outside hospital on March 27, 2017, and was discharged from military service on April 27, 2017, and was judged as being 4th or lower on May 26, 2017.

B. On February 23, 2018, the Plaintiff exceeded from the ice ice on January 2014 to the Defendant on February 23, 2018, and operated a ice ice ice on both sides of the right ice gate, and took the ice gate on December 26, 2016 to walk and walk.

Shesheshesheshel and pains were in mind at the right-side hives, and after being diagnosed with the right-side hives of collision, the group of hives, and the hives of hives in an external hospital, the CRPS was a merger certificate, and the CRPS continued to have deteriorated after being reinstated.

The applicant filed an application for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished service to the State and persons eligible for veteran's compensation by using the “sporesporesporesponding sporesporesporesponding sporesporesponding sporesporesponding sporesporesponding sporesporesponding sporessporesponding to the right side sporesporesporesponding sporesporespondings, and removing the CRPS (hereinafter “instant wounds”). C. On January 7, 2019, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the determination of whether the instant wounds was a kind of illness of the Plaintiff’s relocation to the military, not the possibility of being recognized as having been incurred in the performance of duties or education and training directly related to the national defense, security, etc., and not to be recognized as having been caused or aggravated due to the injury suffered in the course of performing duties or education and training

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1, 2, 3.

arrow