logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2012.11.15 2012고단2513
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

When the defendant becomes aware that D, who is the husband of the victim C, is detained by larceny, etc., he would appoint a lawyer and let him release the husband of the victim by deceiving him.

On December 2, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would appoint an attorney-at-law and allow 10 million won to be released by her husband, on his own initiative, within the vehicle back to the back of the back of the visit to D, which was detained in the Seoul Detention Center, for the first time.”

However, even if the defendant received money from the victim, he did not intend to appoint a lawyer for the above D, and was a plan to use for gambling in a horse race track.

On December 16, 2010, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; and (b) by deceiving the victim; (c) obtained a total of KRW 19 million from the victim as a lawyer fee; (d) 6 million as a bail money on December 23, 2010; and (e) obtained a transfer of KRW 3 million as a deposit money on January 11, 201; and (e) acquired a total of KRW 19 million as a deposit money.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal complaint, a detailed statement of transaction in passbooks, a detailed statement of search and seizure warrant and a reply statement, a criminal investigation report (Attachment to her husband D judgment), a criminal investigation report (a criminal complaint C telephone statement), a criminal investigation report (verification of amount of damage), a criminal investigation report (verification of amount of damage), a criminal investigation report (verification of date and time of detention of her husbandd)

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act [the decision of a sentence] under Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act, including the pertinent provision of the law as to the crime and the choice of punishment, [the scope of sentence to be recommended] fraud [the scope of sentence to be recommended] basic area [the scope of sentence to be recommended] [the general person before adjustment according to the applicable sentences under the law] from June to June (the general person] - reflects the serious element of mitigation [the decision of sentence] committed by the defendant with the intention of conclusive defraudation.

arrow