1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of ruling;

A. The Defendant is the project implementer of the business of constructing Yansan-Yak Pungdong (Public Notice of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, December 19, 201) (hereinafter “instant business”). The Defendant was incorporated into the instant business on June 15, 2012, in which: (a) the Plaintiff was divided into the E 2,396 square meters, the F 523 square meters, the G 1,012 square meters, the B 1,02 square meters, and the G 1,028 square meters, and only the F 523 square meters, G 1,012 square meters, and the G 1,012 square meters.

B. On June 19, 2014, the Central Land Tribunal dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim for purchase of the remaining land or for compensation for losses due to a decrease in the price of the remaining land in 18,723,400 square meters, G 1,012 square meters, G 1,012 square meters, which remain remaining as the remaining land, while rendering a ruling to expropriate the remaining land in 36,229,600 square meters, with the date of expropriation as of August 12, 2014.

C. The Plaintiff filed an objection to the claim for the purchase of the remaining land or the claim for compensation due to a decrease in the price of the remaining land, but the Central Land Expropriation Committee, on November 20, 2014, cannot be deemed as significantly difficult to use the claim for the original purpose because there is no problem with entry, exit, drainage, shape, etc. of the remaining land, and it is confirmed that there is no fall in value as a result of the appraisal.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 4 through 7, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 3, 5, and 7 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion that only part of the land owned by the plaintiff was divided and expropriated, and the land owned by the plaintiff was divided into two parts.

In order to engage in farming in the remaining land of this case, a road for repairing a steel and a steel site shall be dried, and agricultural expenses shall be added as much as the area of agricultural machinery, etc. is narrow so that agricultural products can break up, and there is no farm water deduction of water from a lender and there is still a problem related to repair.

. The above.