The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the defendant's appeal grounds (misunderstanding of facts) did not state to M and I the false fact that "the victim C will immediately be aware of the fact," and "the above company will immediately lose if internal investments are recovered."

Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of all the facts charged of the instant case, thereby erroneous.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, namely, M, in an investigative agency and the lower court’s court, the Defendant is an investor of the victim C, and the victim is deprived of the inside and outside of the investment amount.

L shall not operate the company if the investment is deducted from L due to the absence of foundation.

It will soon be the date of default.

The purport of “around December 2013,” and consistently stated to the effect that “the victim would be deprived of the amount invested,” while making a telephone conversation at the end of the end of the same year, and that “I shall be free from the end of July 2014,” and “I shall be free from the investigative agency and the court of original instance.”

8. From the first notification of H Co., Ltd., the H grants money to “L have invested in money.”

Domine is Domine.

The salary of articles is not timely, and the victim will be able to face immediately.

I would like to not see the level of monthly pay.

“The meaning of “the meaning was”

(3) The victim consistently stated that he entered into a transportation service contract with F Co., Ltd. and provided six bus transportation services, but M Co., Ltd., the head of F’s business division, attempted to request the victim to provide a service of additionally operating two bus buses, but, after hearing the aforementioned horses from the Defendant, waived the plan, and reduced the number of six buses already operated to four.

In addition to the fact that M was in a transaction with the victim, it is difficult to find any motive or incentive to make a statement to the defendant disadvantageous to the victim.