logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.09.03 2015고정487
신용훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 2013, the Defendant, who was employed by the Mediation Committee for the Settlement of Victims (hereinafter referred to as the “victim Company”) as an auditor, had been asked by the actual operator D to leave the company due to the occurrence of the dispute, such as employee employment problems, etc., and had the intent to spread false information in the victim Company’s business partners, etc., thereby impairing the credibility of the victim company.

1. Around October 2013, the Defendant’s credit damage: (a) around October 2013, to G of F in charge of concluding a bus transport contract with the victim company at the FB office located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “F”) around the end of October, 2013; (b) even if the victim company was not in the situation of default, “in Korea” is an investor; and (c) if the domestic amount of investment is deducted, C would be deprived of the investment amount;

If internal organs are fested, C is immediately deceased;

D No corporation shall be operated by the corporation unless there is no bottom-up;

The date of the bankruptcy will be the date of bankruptcy.

"In other words, the victim's credit was damaged by spreading false information."

2. On December 2013, 2013, the Defendant damaged the credit of the victim company by spreading false information to G by warning to the same purport as that of the preceding paragraph through phone calls around the end of December 2013.

3. The Defendant’s credit damage to a police officer from the end of July 2014 to the beginning of August 2014, 2014.

8. The fact at the Haman-si F field office in the Seocho-si, the F field office in the Seocho-si, damaged the credit of the victim company by spreading false facts to the victim company, stating, “The victim company was not in the situation of default immediately, it is an Doar, Doar, Doar, Doar, the news article’s salary will not be known, and the company will not be expected immediately, and it will not receive monthly salary.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Witnesses G and I's respective legal statements;

1. Part of the protocol of interrogation of the defendant by the prosecution as to the defendant

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol against J;

1. DReference materials for a criminal investigation reporter;

arrow