The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Error 1) In light of the background leading up to the occurrence of the instant traffic accident and the fact that the victims lost their certificates, etc., it is difficult to deem that the victims suffered injury to the extent that the rescue was needed due to the instant traffic accident. 2) The Defendant was aware that the victim F was well-grounded and that it was good for the Defendant, and was off the scene, and did not intend to flee.

B. The sentence of a fine of five million won imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The following circumstances, which can be acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court of original instance as to the assertion of mistake of facts: ① A vehicle driven by the defendant was diagnosed by behind the damaged vehicle and the damaged vehicle was pushed down by the shock; ② A victim DNA appealed immediately after the traffic accident in this case; on October 4, 201 following the date of the accident, the victims appealed to the I Hospital, and was diagnosed with the cry and urine alphe, etc.; ③ the victim D was diagnosed by the victims on October 5, 201; the victim F was diagnosed by the victims of the traffic accident at the J Hospital from October 6, 201 to the J Hospital that it was difficult to find the victims of the accident at the time of the occurrence of the accident, and the victim was suffering from the disease other than the driver of the same hospital and the disease and the disease of the victim at the time of the accident in this case.