The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error and inappropriate sentencing)

A. Damages suffered by victims of the instant traffic accident due to mistake of facts are to the extent that it does not significantly impede daily life even without receiving medical treatment, and does not constitute injury as prescribed by the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below (10 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The judgment of the court below on the assertion of mistake of facts is acknowledged based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., (i) the victims did not receive medical treatment under the same or similar name as the injury stated in the facts charged prior to the traffic accident in this case; (ii) the victims’ body might have been exposed to considerable shock in light of the developments and contents of the traffic accident in this case; (iii) the victims D needed medical treatment for three weeks due to the accident in this case, such as her her, her, her, her, and her, her, her, her, her, her, and her, her, her, her, her, and she received a diagnosis that the victims need medical treatment for two weeks due to the following factors: (i) the victims’ date and time close to the date and time of the traffic accident in this case; and (iv) the victims’ body was actually subject to medical treatment for six days from April 11, 2018 to April 16, 2016.

The defendant's assertion of mistake is without merit.

B. The instant traffic accident did not focus on the degree of injury suffered by the victims due to the instant traffic accident, and there was an agreement between the victims and the victims.

However, drinking driving is a kind of driving.