logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.06.25 2015고단1607
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 13, 2015, at around 22:30, the Defendant: (a) confirmed the dispute between the slope F belonging to the Daegu East Police Station Edistrict, the Daegu East Police Station, which was dispatched after receiving a report on D and trial expenses, and recommended the settlement; (b) stated that the Defendant “I am back the said D “I am out of the friet, I am out of the frith, and I am back, because I am out of the frith, I am out of the frith, I am out of the frith, and am back with the frith’s chest at the front of the Ccafeteria located in Daegu East-gu, Daegu; and (c) stated that I am out of the frithm with the 112 frith mick.

The Defendant continuously expressed that “I am am feasia, regardless of whether it is a crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties, I am ambling with the mind,” and assaulted by “I ambling the left arms of the slopeF that prevents him from doing so, and driving the breast in drinking.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties concerning the handling of the 112 reported case by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the F of each police protocol of statement to the F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act include: (a) the Defendant’s use of violence to obstruct the performance of official duties by a police officer with regard to the duty of 112 reporting by the police officer; (b) the degree of violence and obstruction of official duties is relatively minor; (c) the Defendant submitted a written agreement to the effect that the victimized police officer would take the Defendant’s preference against the Defendant; (d) the Defendant committed the instant crime; (c) the Defendant was committed in the course of committing the instant crime; and (d) there is no criminal conviction other than the minor fine; and (d) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive or circumstance of the crime, means and consequence, etc.;

arrow