logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2015.12.23 2015고단925
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person engaging in driving a ready-light vehicle C.

1. On June 17, 2015, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at 0.093% of blood alcohol level, was driving the said ready-light vehicle at the distance of about 3 km from the sloping distance located in 776-24, the starting from the hospital located in the Cheongju-si, Haju-si, an original city to the nearest, while driving around 0.03% of alcohol level.

2. On the date stated in Paragraph 1, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, at least 200 km from the original city level to the front city level of 776-24 Cheongdog, to the front city level of about 40 km from the front city level of Cheongdog, at about a speed of about 40 km.

At the time, it is night, and there are many rains, and it was a road that combines two lanes and two lanes, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely, such as reducing speed and driving a motor vehicle well by driving a motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got the victim D (25 years of age) who walked at the edge of a roadside from the port side to the gate by negligence while under the influence of alcohol, and used it on the road by taking the front part of the steering force of the above ready-light vehicle, while driving the Fpoter II cargo due to negligence in performing the above duty of care, and without finding the victim being used for the above accident, and the victim was under the bottom of the above cargo vehicle, and followed up about 3 km from the above cargo vehicle to the next part of the above cargo vehicle, and led the victim to the death of the victim, i.e., the diver damage, etc. from the seat.

Accordingly, the defendant jointly with E, resulting in the death of the victim by occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police of E.

arrow