beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Around 23:45 on December 21, 2012, the Defendant: (a) driven a Category B Maz car under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 0.105% in a section of about 15km from the site near the site at the original city level to the road near the original city level; (b) to the road near the private ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic e
2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (AD) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accident) are the defendants engaged in driving motor vehicles B;
On December 21, 2012, at around 23:45, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol, and proceeded with roads adjacent to the distance of a private mine in the interest of nuclear power at the time of nuclear power plant at the time of nuclear power plant at the time of nuclear power plant.
At the time, since it is an intersection where a signal is installed at night and at that time, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to reduce the speed and to safely drive the motor vehicle by checking well the right and the right and the right.
Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant, by negligence and negligence, did not thoroughly breath the front time, received the rear part of the D-A-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wed,
In the above occupational negligence, the Defendant: (a) inflicted injury on the victim C, such as brain salvy in need of medical treatment for approximately two weeks; (b) inflicted injury on the victim E, such as influor and tensions and tensions, etc. in the treatment period; and (c) at the same time, (d) damaged the above Aburged vehicle to repair the repair cost of KRW 7,204,171; and (e) did not immediately stop the said burg vehicle to repair cost of KRW 422,792; and (e) escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victims.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant;