Text
1. The defendant 31,428,571 won to the plaintiff A, 19,285,714 won to the plaintiff B, and 21,785,714 won to the plaintiff C and each of the above money.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. Facts of recognition 1) D around 08:14 September 5, 2014, 2014 (hereinafter “instant E E E E E Eler”).
In order to determine whether a bypassing of the road between the two-lanes in the front city of nuclear power and the two-lanes in the front city of nuclear power, the front city of nuclear power is driving, and the front city of nuclear power, the front city of nuclear power and nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant, and the front city of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power and nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power plant of nuclear power.
2) D) As a driver of the instant relicer, D is negligent in performing his duty of care to safely check the front left, and is also on the right side.