beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
Basic Facts
As indicated in the attached list 1, the Plaintiff owned 13 lots, including 525-10, etc. (hereinafter “state-owned land”) in the area of the land located in the area of the former North Korea (hereinafter “instant co-owned land”) as state-owned property, as indicated in the attached list 2, and the Defendant owned 16 lots of land (hereinafter “instant co-owned land”) including 47-13, e.g., the area of the land located in the area of the former North Korea, the area of which was changed to 284-53, as of the date of registration conversion; hereinafter “instant land”).
The instant land is an area designated as a mountain-do national park. The National Park Management Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “Corporation”) is entrusted by the Minister of Environment pursuant to the Natural Parks Act, etc., and performs duties, such as maintenance, management, etc. of mountain-do national parks; and the Sinsando National Park Management Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “instant office”) is a subordinate organization of the Corporation established pursuant to the Natural Parks Act, etc., and performs duties delegated within the Corporation in relation to mountain-do national parks
On September 27, 2010, the Defendant requested the instant office to “consultation on the change of the state property management plan” to exchange state property under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Environment with the Defendant’s public property located within the mountain-do national park zone located outside the mountain-do national park zone in order to facilitate the implementation of the project to create mountain-do bathing beaches and tourist destinations.
Accordingly, on November 16, 2010, the instant office requested the Defendant to include six parcels of land subject to exchange, such as the “consultation on the change of the State-owned Property Management Plan,” which was requested by the Defendant, in order to secure a site for the establishment of an information center for the exploration of the national park, and on January 10, 2011, based on the “No. 2010-195 of the Ministry of Environment’s Notice”, the “emulsion visit site” is newly established.