logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2020.06.04 2020고정32
수산업법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

The person who is engaged in the fishing and fishing as the captain of the Rian-gun C (4.36 tons) in Busan-gun, which was designated and approved as the management line of the shellfish fish farms with a license for the fishing and fishing and fishing and fishing fishing and fishing operation.

A fishery right holder who has been designated as a control vessel shall not use the control vessel to capture, gather or cultivate marine animals and plants on the waters other than the designated fishing ground area or approved area.

Nevertheless, from March 18, 2019 to around 08:30 to 09:40 on the same day, the above-mentioned management line C is used when capturing and gathering approximately 100 km of the above-mentioned fishing vessel and 7 seas in the vicinity of 0.9 m. (N 35-39.17, N 126-28.03) on the southwestwest-west side of the west-gun located in the west-gun of the west-gun of the Northwest-gun of the Republic of Korea (N 35-39.17, N 126-28.03) from the west-west side of the west-gun of the east-gun of the Republic of Korea, which exceeds the 0.7 m. (N.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the detection of fishing vessels in violation (the use of a control vessel and the prohibition thereof) and a report on the detection;

1. C Photographssary evidence in violation of the Fisheries Act;

1. A report on internal investigation (limited to a fishing license site and fishing ground district map) and the location map of fishing grounds;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (C Operation);

1. Relevant Article 98 subparagraph 4 of the Fisheries Act and Article 27 (4) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The judgment that the act of using the management line for diving fishing has already been illegal, after completing only the report on the reason for sentencing the punishment of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act in the custody of a workhouse.

(former District Court 2019No1275, Supreme Court 2019Do18400). The Defendant has been punished four times for a violation of the Fisheries Act even before.

Punishment shall be determined in consideration of the history and scale of the crime, etc.

arrow