logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.05.01 2018고단38
사기
Text

Defendant

E Imprisonment for 10 months, each of the defendants A, B, C, and D shall be punished by imprisonment for 6 months.

except that this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 22, 2016, Defendant A was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Registration of Loan Business and the Protection of Financial Users, etc. at the Daegu District Court, and the decision was finalized on March 31, 2017. Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on Specialized Credit Business at the Daegu District Court on July 22, 2016, and the decision became final and conclusive on September 19, 2016. Defendant C was sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on Special Credit Business at the Daegu District Court on July 22, 2016, and for a violation of the Act on Special Credit Business at the Daegu District Court on September 19, 2016.

Criminal facts

Defendant

B is a pharmacist who operated "M pharmacy in the Daegu Dong-gu L, and Defendant E was a pharmacist who operated "O pharmacy in the Daegu Suwon-gu N" from May 2008 to May 2010; Defendant D was a pharmacist who operated " Q pharmacy" in the Daegu Suwon-gu P; Defendant C operated "O pharmacy in the Daegu Suwon-gu N from June 201 to June 201; Defendant C operated "O pharmacy" in the Daegu Suwon-gu N from around February 201 to around February 2014; and Defendant A worked as an employee at the above pharmacy.

1. Defendants A and B, by taking advantage of the personal information of their family members and branch members, provided a false prescription issued as if they had received medical treatment at a hospital despite having not received medical treatment, and were urged to make a false claim for medical care benefits by claiming medicine expenses to the National Health Insurance Corporation as if they had prepared the medicine to the patient.

Defendant

A A around January 2, 2008, upon request on the issuance of a prescription to the doctor in the hospital as if he/she had received the medical treatment, even though T had not received the medical treatment at the hospital, and Defendant B used the above prescription issued at the above M pharmacy to make it possible for the patient to prepare medicines.

arrow