Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 60,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a pharmacist who has operated a pharmacy in Gyeongnam Development Group D.

1. The Defendant had received a false prescription issued as if the patient had received medical treatment but had not received such treatment from the F Hospital, etc., and had the patient receive a false prescription from the F Hospital, etc., and had the patient receive medical care benefits by claiming medicine expenses from the National Health Insurance Corporation.

On October 1, 2007, the Defendant used a prescription for 99 medical professionals including patients G at the above pharmacy, and claimed drug expenses from the National Health Insurance Corporation.

However, the fact was that the F Hospital received a false prescription for the said 99 medical professionals from the F Hospital, and thus, it was not possible to claim drug expenses from the above medical professionals because it was not actually prepared.

Accordingly, the Defendant, as seen above, by deceiving the victim and receiving KRW 735,340 as a medical care benefit from the victim, from that time until September 1, 2010, by deceiving the victim by the same method 37 times in total, as shown in the attached Table of Crimes (1), received medical care benefits equivalent to the sum of KRW 50,972,610 from the victim.

2. The Defendant had a false prescription issued as if the patient had not received medical treatment but received it from the F Hospital, etc., and had the patient receive a false prescription from the F Hospital, etc., and had the patient receive medical care by claiming medicine expenses from the competent local government to the competent local government.

On September 1, 2009, the Defendant claimed drug expenses from the above pharmacy, using a prescription for patient H, to the victim cultivation group.

However, the fact was that the F Hospital received a false prescription for the patient H, and thus, it was not possible to claim medicine expenses because it was not actually prepared for the medicine to H.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to it from the victim.