logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2008.1.31.선고 2007다25063 판결
손해배상(기)
Cases

207Da25063 Compensation (as stated)

Plaintiff, Appellant

Park IT (E)

SEM in the case of an official week

Defendant, Appellee

Korea

The legal representative and the Minister of Justice;

A litigation performer;

Judgment of the lower court

Suwon District Court Decision 2006Na15400 Decided February 9, 2007

Imposition of Judgment

January 31, 2008

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate brief filed after the deadline).

The court below rejected the plaintiff's assertion that "the head of Busan Correctional Institution, who is a public official of the defendant, infringed the plaintiff's legitimate right to correspondence by imposing restrictions on sending the letter of this case to the Busan Correctional Institution, although it does not constitute a ground for restriction on sending it under the Criminal Administration Act." The plaintiff tried to send correspondence to the Daegu Correctional Institution on November 1, 201 and 2, but the prison officers in charge of the defendant's abuse of authority and obstruction of obstruction of use against the defendant's own authority, asserting that the defendant's act of sending it to the Busan Correctional Institution was not legitimate. The court below's decision on April 4, 2002, which stated that the defendant's act of sending it to the Busan Correctional Institution No. 2 was not erroneous in the misapprehension of the legal principles as to the defendant's allegation that the defendant's act of sending it to the Busan Correctional Institution No. 1 and the defendant's 2's appeal against the defendant's non-guilty prison officer's allegation that it was unlawful.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Park Jae-young

Justices Lee Hong-hoon

Justices Kim Young-ran

Justices Kim Jae-sik

Justices Noh Jeong-hee

arrow