1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. On August 3, 2012, the Plaintiff was confined to Gwangju Prison due to a violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (sexual intercourse, such as deceptive scheme). On August 9, 2013, the Plaintiff was transferred from the Gwangju Prison to the Sejong Prison, and on September 25, 2013, to the Sejong Prison, and is in the process of being transferred to the North Korean Prison from the Sejong Prison.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of evidence No. 1, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff's human rights were infringed or suffered from mental suffering due to the following reasons while in his/her custody in his/her prison, the defendant shall pay five million won as compensation for damages to the plaintiff.

The Plaintiff filed an application for a ward with a disabled person or a change of a ward due to his/her trouble in the course of the training hall. At the time, the head of a wood prison did not designate a ward with a disabled person or a change of a ward due to abuse of discretion, and thus, did not infringe the Plaintiff’s fundamental rights and health rights, and violated Article 15 of the Administration and Treatment of Correctional Institution Inmates Act.

B. During the period of investigation and detention of the Plaintiff’s infringement of fundamental rights during the period of investigation and detention and the execution of a set-off, the head of Yeongdeungpo Prison, upon arbitrary and uniform judgment, limited the Plaintiff’s separate custody and payment of the Plaintiff’s goods, such as personal interest, trial-related documents, writing instruments, family photographs, etc., and the Plaintiff did not pay the Plaintiff even if she needs a stone or beeut,

C. Around August 12, 2013 and September 6, 2013, a prisoner, who is not a correctional officer, received or delivered correspondence, was violated human rights without being protected by the Plaintiff’s personal information.

On August 9, 2013, 2013, the medical officer and staff at the time of the Plaintiff’s physical examination meet two times the Plaintiff’s her am and her am and her am.