logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.09.23 2015나31920
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. From October 201, the Plaintiff is responsible for the emergency countermeasures against the Changwon-si E Apartment-gu, Changwon-si (hereinafter “instant apartment”) and the 102 representative of the instant apartment from April 2012.

B. Defendant B: (a) from November 201 to August 2012, 2010, the president of the instant apartment housing council; and (b) Defendant C was the auditor of the said council of occupants’ representatives from October 201 to February 2012; and (c) Defendant D was the president of the instant apartment housing association from 2011.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Eul's evidence No. 13, Eul's evidence No. 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant B and D

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is consolation money for mental suffering caused by Defendant B and D’s unlawful acts as follows, and Defendant B is obligated to pay KRW 10 million to the Plaintiff, and Defendant D is jointly and severally liable with Defendant B to pay KRW 5 million out of the said amount.

1) On July 31, 2012, Defendant B, including the Plaintiff, issued the head of the management office and employees of the instant apartment complex with an unfair instruction that, according to the end of the council of occupants’ representatives, Defendant B would not take any action without properly deliberating on the overall matters of the apartment, as it seems that the same representative was gathering at the same time, and as such, it would have been difficult for Defendant B to take part in the instant apartment elevator with a false statement attached to the instant apartment elevator, and damaged the Plaintiff’s reputation on October 11, 2012, the Defendant B attempted to publicize the Plaintiff on October 11, 2012, and unilaterally notify the occupants of the distorted fact about the F Sports Center and to unilaterally notify the contract termination at the remaining time for three months until January 30, 2013 and to damage the Plaintiff’s reputation by pointing out the following false information:

(No. 2) Defendant B, Defendant B, April 24, 2014, is an apartment of this case.

arrow